Re: Windows XP Only
- From: "Ross Ridge" <rridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Jul 2006 01:01:46 -0700
Ralph Trickey wrote:
SOME games. Unless you're doing 3D, then the GDI is faster.
No, that's not true either. Both Direct3D and DirectDraw are faster at
2D graphics than GDI. Direct3D also allows advanced techniquies like
sprite rotation/scaling and alpha blending to be done in hardware which
can prohibitively expensive do in software when using Direct3D or GDI.
For a game with relatively simple graphics requirements like the
Operational Art of War then GDI is fast enough, but there's a reason
why you never saw any 2D RTS games use GDI.
Ross Ridge
.
- References:
- Re: Windows XP Only
- From: Gandalf Parker
- Re: Windows XP Only
- From: Ham Pastrami
- Re: Windows XP Only
- From: Gandalf Parker
- Re: Windows XP Only
- From: UVP
- Re: Windows XP Only
- From: Someone
- Re: Windows XP Only
- From: Garrot
- Re: Windows XP Only
- From: Reece Hasson
- Re: Windows XP Only
- From: Quaestor
- Re: Windows XP Only
- From: Walter Mitty
- Re: Windows XP Only
- From: Loren Pechtel
- Re: Windows XP Only
- From: Ross Ridge
- Re: Windows XP Only
- From: Loren Pechtel
- Re: Windows XP Only
- From: Ross Ridge
- Re: Windows XP Only
- From: Ralph Trickey
- Re: Windows XP Only
- Prev by Date: Re: How to improve MOO2? Or, what MOO3 should have been?
- Next by Date: Re: Windows XP Only
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows XP Only
- Next by thread: Re: Windows XP Only
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|