Re: Am I the only one to think Civ 3 was better ?
- From: shadows <shadows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:42:42 -0600
On 2005-10-30, Michael Mils <mickmils@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm not a "back in the days, games were better" ***, but
> honesly. Why the slow 3D ? Why the clunky interface ?
> Remove that, and you get Civ3. I really can do without
> the new work/religion/etc systems. And I like having a ton
> of cities...
I can tell you Civ1 is still a favourite of mine over the rest of
the series. Civ4 I haven't figured out yet. The custom government
thing is really awful. The tech tree and map both feel to small
too.
Just as an FYI I only get to the Classical era before getting
beaten by barbarians or other Civs.
.
- References:
- Am I the only one to think Civ 3 was better ?
- From: Michael Mils
- Am I the only one to think Civ 3 was better ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Civ4 Graphics level settings
- Next by Date: Civ IV - Razing Cities Question
- Previous by thread: Re: Am I the only one to think Civ 3 was better ?
- Next by thread: Re: Civ4 Graphics level settings
- Index(es):