Re: Am I the only one to think Civ 3 was better ?

On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 11:05:36 -0600, "wwd" <wwd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Actually I never got into Civ3 that much, played it
>from
>time to time but it never kept me up late ... not sure why, other than by
>the time you got into the modern era the micromanagement was so tedious
>that I rarely finished games.

The problem for me, was that Civ3 *did* keep me up but the turns
weren't as enjoyable as my game progressed. By the end I was aching to
finish and so I didn't play more than three full games - glad I only
played it on my brother's computer...


--
Alex
atheist #2007
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Am I the only one to think Civ 3 was better ?
    ... > Am I the only who think Civ3 was better? ... Hm, from my first impression, Civ4 might be the best civ since the original ... of course the newer Civs are more polished games, ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic)
  • Civ 4 - Disappointed.
    ... I have played four long games of Civ4 now, and I just can't find the ... Resources seem too easy to come by. ... medium/small areas and yet had each and every possible resource. ... Back to Civ3, I really was looking forward to Civ4 too. ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic)
  • Re: Am I the only one to think Civ 3 was better ?
    ... >I'm not a "back in the days, games were better" bastard, but ... >the new work/religion/etc systems. ... >Am I the only who think Civ3 was better? ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic)
  • Re: Poker keeping pool rooms alive?
    ... I've played up there a few times but it's tough, ... games I guess. ... Alex ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.sport.billiard)
  • Civ 3-- what am I missing?
    ... I recently dusted off my copy of Civ3. ... Didn't play it a lot earlier on; ... this game? ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.sys.mac.games.strategic)