Re: Am I the only one to think Civ 3 was better ?
- From: "James_" <_no_@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:17:45 -0700
"Michael Mils" <mickmils@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dk2845$hcr$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I'm not a "back in the days, games were better" ***, but
> honesly. Why the slow 3D ? Why the clunky interface ?
> Remove that, and you get Civ3. I really can do without
> the new work/religion/etc systems. And I like having a ton
> of cities...
>
> The world maps seem smaller too.
>
> So I'm surprised I haven't seen a thread already about that.
> Am I the only who think Civ3 was better ?
>
> --
> --
> Mickmils
>
> Journalisme total ?
> http://mickmils2.free.fr
I didn't care for civ3. I think it's the worst of the bunch.
.
- References:
- Am I the only one to think Civ 3 was better ?
- From: Michael Mils
- Am I the only one to think Civ 3 was better ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Am I the only one to think Civ 3 was better ?
- Next by Date: Re: Civ 4: Initial impressions of differences between it and prior versions.
- Previous by thread: Re: Am I the only one to think Civ 3 was better ?
- Next by thread: Re: Am I the only one to think Civ 3 was better ?
- Index(es):
