Re: So.... Diablo 3.

Mark Morrison wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:17:42 +1000, Nostromo <nostromo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

As cynical as I am about hype & new games, I'm yet to see anything negative about this title, except maybe the conspicuously obvious by its absence TCP LAN multiplayer, which is a must have for the Mrs & I. In any case, unless they do an about-face on some key elements of gameplay or design, I can't see how they could *** up the title from here; well, BNet2 could be a bugfest or fall over due to demand day/week/month 1, but as I said, I'll be happy with solo/LAN play for 2-3 mths before I delve online again. Certainly have to keep myself away from hardcore if they ever include it - just not good for the nerves or r/ships at my age <G>.

We'll have to set up some sissypig group nights :)

Farkin-A!!! I'm emailing CB - he's probably not awake on this :)

--
Nostromo
.

Quantcast