Re: So.... Diablo 3.
- From: Mark Morrison <blank@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:34:24 +0100
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:17:42 +1000, Nostromo <nostromo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
As cynical as I am about hype & new games, I'm yet to see anything
negative about this title, except maybe the conspicuously obvious by its
absence TCP LAN multiplayer, which is a must have for the Mrs & I. In
any case, unless they do an about-face on some key elements of gameplay
or design, I can't see how they could *** up the title from here; well,
BNet2 could be a bugfest or fall over due to demand day/week/month 1,
but as I said, I'll be happy with solo/LAN play for 2-3 mths before I
delve online again. Certainly have to keep myself away from hardcore if
they ever include it - just not good for the nerves or r/ships at my age
<G>.
We'll have to set up some sissypig group nights :)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: So.... Diablo 3.
- From: Nostromo
- Re: So.... Diablo 3.
- References:
- So.... Diablo 3.
- From: Mickmils
- Re: So.... Diablo 3.
- From: Nostromo
- So.... Diablo 3.
- Prev by Date: Re: Was 10 years ago "It" for PC games?
- Next by Date: Re: So.... Diablo 3.
- Previous by thread: Re: So.... Diablo 3.
- Next by thread: Re: So.... Diablo 3.
- Index(es):