Re: Worst review of all time?
- From: "littlemute" <littlemute@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Dec 2005 13:47:46 -0800
Walter Mitty wrote:
> "littlemute" risked the wrath of Usenet weenies mastering
> mommies computer when he ventured forth on 2005-12-30, commmitted
> his life to the whims of Google, and spluttered:
> >
> > Decimal 0 is not representational of one of two mutually excusive
> > states:
> >
> > 0 = sucks
> > 1 = good
> >
>
> Decimal 0 is exactly the same value as a binary 0. You must be
> referring to "set" or "unset" on the "game recommended" line...
>
> But thinking about it : your entire world seems to be binary if thats
> how you castegorise games. Enough of the joke : you *are* joking
> aren't you? Please tell me you are.
I *am* not *joking* about the *binary* system for game reviews. Siskel
and *Ebert* have the thumbs *up* and thumbs down for films, what's the
*dif*?
Here's an example: http://www.woodenmen.org/game_reviews/moo3
.
- References:
- Re: Worst review of all time?
- From: turk
- Re: Worst review of all time?
- From: cutterjohn
- Re: Worst review of all time?
- From: littlemute
- Re: Worst review of all time?
- From: littlemute
- Re: Worst review of all time?
- From: littlemute
- Re: Worst review of all time?
- Prev by Date: Re: Fantasy fuels games with finances
- Next by Date: Re: Spacer Rangers 2
- Previous by thread: Re: Worst review of all time?
- Next by thread: Re: Worst review of all time?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|