Re: Worst review of all time?
- From: "littlemute" <littlemute@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Dec 2005 11:50:22 -0800
The review itself goes into the details about the game to give the
'feel' of it, but the bottom line is either 1 or 0. None of this 78%
3.5/5 crap. It's either recommended or it's not.
Like World of Warcraft: it looks cool and has some gameplay but you
don't gain actual skill in play over time like Quake or Go or Chess;
your character simply improves over time and you unlock more content as
you go along. A better player will improve faster, but given time
whatever a players choices are, they will reach level 60. Since you
cannot die and suffer no repercussions from character death, the actual
"game" involved with WoW is trying to find time from Real Life to play
the game to unlock more content. The game is trying to find time to
play the game. Hence it's binary 0.
.
- References:
- Re: Worst review of all time?
- From: turk
- Re: Worst review of all time?
- From: cutterjohn
- Re: Worst review of all time?
- From: littlemute
- Re: Worst review of all time?
- Prev by Date: Re: Fantasy fuels games with finances
- Next by Date: Re: Worst review of all time?
- Previous by thread: Re: Worst review of all time?
- Next by thread: Re: Worst review of all time?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
