Re: LCD Response Time(Monitor Recommendation)
- From: FoolsGold <fg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 19:49:01 +0930
Garrot wrote:
If you are going to tell me that they are less fatiguing than CRT then I suggest you look up LCD fatigue caused by fluorescent back lighting.
Two words: Refresh Rate.
LCD doesn't need one, hence zero chance of eye fatigue from flickering. Yes, the better the CRT the higher you can bump the refresh rate, but still, one less thing to deal with.
I suffered a little fatigue when I got my LCD screen, but you get used to the brightness after a while and the strain goes away pretty quickly. You give and you take, no matter what type of monitor you choose.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LCD Response Time(Monitor Recommendation)
- From: Garrot
- Re: LCD Response Time(Monitor Recommendation)
- References:
- LCD Response Time(Monitor Recommendation)
- From: Searcher7
- Re: LCD Response Time(Monitor Recommendation)
- From: Garrot
- Re: LCD Response Time(Monitor Recommendation)
- From: HockeyTownUSA
- Re: LCD Response Time(Monitor Recommendation)
- From: Walter Mitty
- Re: LCD Response Time(Monitor Recommendation)
- From: Garrot
- LCD Response Time(Monitor Recommendation)
- Prev by Date: Re: Just Cause demo - Steamkiller admits to piracy in the past and not anymore
- Next by Date: Re: LCD Response Time(Monitor Recommendation)
- Previous by thread: Re: LCD Response Time(Monitor Recommendation)
- Next by thread: Re: LCD Response Time(Monitor Recommendation)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|