Re: Form Definitions and printing using Gumbo Dicer

Thanks for the information guys. We were looking at dicer for two
separate projects and it works great for one of them and the other,
well, the spool files are too different to make it work. Oh well,
thanks again for all of the information ...

Dr.UgoGagliardelli wrote:
Rodney A. Johnson wrote:
Merging AFPDS spooled files isn't impossible. Just impractical. Most
merging software takes the first spooled file's attributes and assumes
that the rest of the spooled files have the same attributes.

The best way to merge files would be to analyze all the files to be
merged and build the appropriate inline form definition to cover the
attributes correctly. Then when generating a new spooled file for
attributes such as DRAWER or DUPLEX set them to *FORMDF. Of course as
the files were merged into one, the data stream would have to be
modified to use the form definition and all the little nuances that go
with use of resources (library lists) and form definitions.
[...]
I want just point out that this figure is much impractical than it could
appear. Usually or better very often, a form definition is created by
default, and by default with the same name (something like DFTFORMD).
When you put multiple inline form definition in the same AFP data stream
with the same name then you'll not be able to print it: at least PSF,
escapes stating that more than one AFP resource were found with the same
name.

--
Dr.Ugo Gagliardelli,Modena,ItalyCertifiedUindoscrasherAñejoAlcoolInside
Spaccamaroni andate a cagare/Spammers not welcome/Spammers vão à merda
Spamers iros a la mierda/Spamers allez vous faire foutre/Spammers loop
schijten/Spammers macht Euch vom Acker/Spamerzy wypierdalac'

.