Re: Graphic ASM Code for HP49/50
- From: Yann <kdo4973@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
hardcoded address is probably not the best idea around ?
Whenever I've used symbol tables that were missing anything I needed,
I just inserted my own definition of the value of the symbol;
this should be okay as long as it's a "stable" location.
Yes, i agree, that's also what i'm doing,
but my reasoning was :
if it is not even part of Carsten Entry list, which seems to do a
pretty nice job at checking entry stability,
( These entries can be consulted here :
http://staff.science.uva.nl/~dominik/hpcalc/entries/index.html )
then there is probably a reason for this.
Consequence : the address i could "hard-code" (using my own
definition) may simply fail in circumstances i'm not able to test
correctly right now. Well, sort of....
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Graphic ASM Code for HP49/50
- From: Andreas Möller
- Re: Graphic ASM Code for HP49/50
- References:
- Graphic ASM Code for HP49/50
- From: Yann
- Re: Graphic ASM Code for HP49/50
- From: John H Meyers
- Graphic ASM Code for HP49/50
- Prev by Date: Re: Graphic ASM Code for HP49/50
- Next by Date: Re: Using Debug4x for large projects
- Previous by thread: Re: Graphic ASM Code for HP49/50
- Next by thread: Re: Graphic ASM Code for HP49/50
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading