Re: OT: Re: Xcas
- From: parisse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:34:01 +0200
Also i would like to clarify some doubts about the CAS, mainly in the
part of simbolic calculus, as a result of some made comparisons of
speed with one TI... more specifically with time of evaluation of the
integral of this one function:
x 2007 ^ x LN *
A friend commented to me that TI uses a system of tables of integrals
that make the evaluation much more fast, and in fact it is it, because
in my 50g gave a time of 268s and TI made it in 4 or 5 seconds...
the reason for slowness on the 50g is that
dense polynomials are used (i.e. a list of size
2008 to represent x^2007). You can use IBP
X^Y*LN(X)
X^(Y+1)
IBP
INTVX
+
'Y=2007'
SUBST
Fortunately, I have improved this on Xcas (int(x^2007*ln(x),x))
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Re: Xcas
- From: s3basmagr1
- Re: OT: Re: Xcas
- References:
- Xcas
- From: s3basmagr1
- Re: Xcas
- From: johnet123
- OT: Re: Xcas
- From: @(none)
- Re: OT: Re: Xcas
- From: s3basmagr1
- Xcas
- Prev by Date: Gawd! i hate computers...!!! { re:: Big Bang Backgammon )
- Next by Date: Orpie Revisited...???
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Re: Xcas
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Re: Xcas
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading