Re: HP-50g thin, why not?
- From: bokubob <jeisch@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 15:14:26 -0700
On Sep 1, 3:52 pm, Michael Heinz <ObviousTr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It wouldn't be quite that simple, would it? They'd have to design a
carrier to allow the polymer to be removed and replaced when it wears
out
Apple doesn't! Seriously, if they assemble the case with screws like
the 35s and you can toss in a "standard sized" battery with a little
plug, I doubt anyone would complain. Or ask the iPaq guys to use one
of their batteries, and already have the design/production problem
solved.
and they'd have to add charging circuitry~$1 in quantities of one..
and an AC adapter. I
imagine that would add quite a bit to the cost of the unit.
very low current, and with decent charging circuitry, not even picky.
How much do you pay for a cell phone charger off ebay? It should cost
less than that to make....
So, $10 total, in quantities of 1, excluding the change to the molding
for the case. This seems like a low price to pay to have a product
that stands out in a sea of graphing calculators. Why does an HP 50g
need to look just like a TI-89 (if you take off your glasses)? Why
not make a RAZR (in terms of style and market success) of a
calculator?
-Jonathan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HP-50g thin, why not?
- From: Volker Neurath
- Re: HP-50g thin, why not?
- From: ~kurt
- Re: HP-50g thin, why not?
- From: eric
- Re: HP-50g thin, why not?
- References:
- HP-50g thin, why not?
- From: bokubob
- Re: HP-50g thin, why not?
- From: Michael Heinz
- HP-50g thin, why not?
- Prev by Date: Re: Urroz nonworking example DE's...??
- Next by Date: Re: HP 33s and 35s Functional Differences
- Previous by thread: Re: HP-50g thin, why not?
- Next by thread: Re: HP-50g thin, why not?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|