Re: SysRPL Runstream and Return Stack
- From: "John H Meyers" <jhmeyers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:49:28 -0500
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:18:44 -0500, Giancarlo wrote:
if there are no composites in the runstream,
there would never be need of a Return Stack....
There are *always* composites in the runstream;
the topmost level in the entire system is called
StartupProc, which in turn calls a "System Outer Loop"
that waits for each keystroke and then acts on it,
which in turn calls various other system functions
(each itself a composite), eventually calling
some program of yours, which is also a composite
(every "program object" [type 8] is a composite, in fact),
which in turn contains words calling built-in commands,
which themselves are composites, etc. etc. etc.
Just the usual "wheels within wheels,"
which everyone is always reinventing :)
http://www.voteamericavote.com/registry/ezekiels_wheel.html
.
- References:
- SysRPL Runstream and Return Stack
- From: Giancarlo
- SysRPL Runstream and Return Stack
- Prev by Date: Re: Hidden Directory???
- Next by Date: Need little help with HPGCC and Graph
- Previous by thread: Re: SysRPL Runstream and Return Stack
- Next by thread: Hidden Directory???
- Index(es):