Re: Is MetaKernel 2.30 actually MetaKernel 2.29?
- From: Wayne Brown <fwbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:53:23 GMT
hpsolo <rs1n@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here's my setup:
>
> - MK in port 1 (write-protected; 128kB card).
> - MK Flags: { # 408040h # 0h } (use RCLF2 and save your flags, and
> store these flags as your own for testing)
> - MKTAB (entries table) in port 0 (but flag -25 is cleared, so it
> doesn't use the entries table)
> - No cards in slot 2
>
> Run the following program:
>
Well, by using the same setup as yours (and a few variations) I managed to
reproduce all the errors you mentioned: warmstarts, integers becoming
reals, "insufficient memory" message, and (once) a complete lockup
when exiting the editor. Strange that I've never run across any of
these before...
--
Wayne Brown (HPCC #1104) | "When your tail's in a crack, you improvise
fwbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | if you're good enough. Otherwise you give
| your pelt to the trapper."
e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 -- Euler | -- John Myers Myers, "Silverlock"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is MetaKernel 2.30 actually MetaKernel 2.29?
- From: hpsolo
- Re: Is MetaKernel 2.30 actually MetaKernel 2.29?
- References:
- Is MetaKernel 2.30 actually MetaKernel 2.29?
- From: hpsolo
- Re: Is MetaKernel 2.30 actually MetaKernel 2.29?
- From: hpsolo
- Re: Is MetaKernel 2.30 actually MetaKernel 2.29?
- From: Jean-Yves Avenard
- Re: Is MetaKernel 2.30 actually MetaKernel 2.29?
- From: hpsolo
- Re: Is MetaKernel 2.30 actually MetaKernel 2.29?
- From: Wayne Brown
- Re: Is MetaKernel 2.30 actually MetaKernel 2.29?
- From: hpsolo
- Is MetaKernel 2.30 actually MetaKernel 2.29?
- Prev by Date: Re: Inform box choose list, hp 49g question.
- Next by Date: Re: HHC 2005 Conference
- Previous by thread: Re: Is MetaKernel 2.30 actually MetaKernel 2.29?
- Next by thread: Re: Is MetaKernel 2.30 actually MetaKernel 2.29?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
