OT: Really true?
- From: Brice Yokem <byokem@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:33:09 -0400
McCain and the N Y Times
McCain sent an op-ed piece to the New York Times. Obama had one last
week, so it was hardly surprising. The Times rejected McCain's editorial
demanding that
"the article would have to articulate, in concrete terms, how Senator McCain
defines victory in Iraq. It would also have to lay out a clear plan for achieving
victory -- with troops levels, timetables and measures for compelling the Iraqis
to cooperate.
"And it would need to describe the senator’s Afghanistan strategy, spelling out
how it meshes with his Iraq plan."
Astonishing. All this before the mighty New York Time will accept an op-ed
piece by the nominee of the Republican Party. Which tells us pretty well all we
need to know about where the Times stands on the election. Read again what
the editors demanded. Think on it.
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Really true?
- From: Denys Beauchemin
- Re: OT: Really true?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Oil prices, and is it a conspiracy of sorts?
- Next by Date: Re: DTC problem?
- Previous by thread: <Plug> HP 3000 Server Memory
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Really true?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|