Re: CMD RamLink Loader test

On Jan 28, 2:12 pm, Joseph Fenn <jf...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Since you seem to know quite a bit about the ramlink, I have a
question for you.  How come the original units used a 12 vdc
.> power supply, and the later ones put out by Maurice used a 9 vdc
supply. I may have blown my second one as just unplugged
the original DC supply cord plugged in the Maurice one into the
later version. I assume it must blew the heck out of the 2nd one.

I inherited my RL and an FD 4000 before Maurice Randall bought
out the CMD business. I have since sold the FD4K and only posess
an RL. IIRC, both had the same 9 volt, 1 amp power supply. I can't
say why the power specifications may have changed along the way.
My first guess is that a supply of cheaper 9 Volt supplies became
available. There could be more fundamental reasons for the change.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: CMD RamLink Loader test
    ... How come the original units used a 12 vdc power supply, ... DC supply cord plugged in the Maurice one into the later version. ... Hey Joe! ... fix the problem. ...
    (comp.sys.cbm)
  • Re: CMD RamLink Loader test
    ...  How come the original units used a 12 vdc power supply, ... DC supply cord plugged in the Maurice one into the later version. ... I assume it must blew the heck out of the 2nd one. ... That I dont know. ...
    (comp.sys.cbm)
  • Re: CMD RamLink Loader test
    ... Since you seem to know quite a bit about the ramlink, ... How come the original units used a 12 vdc power supply, ... DC supply cord plugged in the Maurice one into the later version. ...
    (comp.sys.cbm)