Re: Commodore: Why they never made a 64D?
- From: dunric@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 29 Oct 2005 02:42:50 -0700
BASIC 7.0 is only "slow" because of all the commands it has to support
and process. You can always kick it into FAST mode (2 Mhz) if the speed
bothers you so much.
The Plus/4 is basically halfway between the C64 and 128 in
capabilities, sans sprites and the SID chip. BASIC 3.5 is better than
BASIC 2.0, but lacks many of the commands of BASIC 7.0.
I actually used CP/M quite a lot, as my grandfather has some old Kaypro
II software and I used that when in CP/M 3.0 mode. It was quite
interesting. Not exactly my cup of tea -- I was mainly into games and
programming -- but it wasn't useless, either.
The C-128 too expensive??? For the price, you are literally getting
three computers in a single package: A C64, a C128 and CP/M. At an
initial price of $299, that's a _FANTASTIC_ bargain.
The C-128D is large for an 8-bit machine simply because it incorporates
a C-128 motherboard with a 1571 disk drive. All that space is needed
for the electronics.
The 80-column mode HAD to be on a separate chip; otherwise, a new VIC
chip -- with some compatibility problems -- would have been designed,
causing the machine to be less compatible overall. That's not what the
designers were aiming for. Rather, they were aiming to please both the
gamers and business people who wanted both a 40 and 80-column machine
capable of games AND acceptable word processing/speedsheet
capabilities.
Overall, anyone who doesn't like the Commodore 128 is too attached to
the C64. Why buy a C64 when you can buy a C128 with all the features
mentioned above -- PLUS a C64 mode?
The C64 was a cheap computer that sold well, mainly due to marketing
and the VIC/SID chip.
The C128 was a fairly cheap computer that sold well, mainly due to C64
compatibility and 80-columns (in 128 mode).
The Amiga...well...that's not an 8-bit machine, is it?
Paul
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Commodore: Why they never made a 64D?
- From: agila61
- Re: Commodore: Why they never made a 64D?
- References:
- Commodore: Why they never made a 64D?
- From: dunric
- Commodore: Why they never made a 64D?
- Prev by Date: Re: Commodore: Why they never made a 64D?
- Next by Date: Re: Commodore: Why they never made a 64D?
- Previous by thread: Re: Commodore: Why they never made a 64D?
- Next by thread: Re: Commodore: Why they never made a 64D?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|