Re: Self-Extracting .SFX or .SDA maker?
- From: "Leif Bloomquist" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:02:19 -0400
"Joe Forster/STA" <sta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:CwZHI5Nmqyft@xxxxxxxxx
> a Commodore, on the Net somewhere. If creating self-extracting LHA
archives
> on a PC is fine, use Star LHA ("starlha a <diskname> -s <archivename>").
> (They can only process the contents of disk images, not individual files.)
Thanks Joe! It's easy enough to throw the files into a D64 with D64Editor,
or Star Commander. That worked fine, thanks.
Incidentally, the resulting SFX's also work perfectly well on an IDE64, as
long as there isn't a '/' in any of the file names.
Regards,
Leif
.
- References:
- Self-Extracting .SFX or .SDA maker?
- From: Leif Bloomquist
- Re: Self-Extracting .SFX or .SDA maker?
- From: Joe Forster/STA
- Self-Extracting .SFX or .SDA maker?
- Prev by Date: Re: ON-TOPIC: Stable Raster Routine
- Next by Date: Re: Commodore's demise in 1994
- Previous by thread: Re: Self-Extracting .SFX or .SDA maker?
- Next by thread: Re: Self-Extracting .SFX or .SDA maker?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading