Re: Combatting Troll Non-Sense

On 08 Apr 2006 22:11:48 -0800, "amiga guy" <anamigan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Que?? What exactly is a "TerryTroll Reversal" and when has my
newsreader ever done it?

Standing still looking stupidly into the headlights is not a
survival tactic.

Isn't it strange how you are capable of making such observations but
painfully unable to implement them.

I don't need paranoia to tell me what your twisted agenda is - you've
been broadcasting that for years. As for your newsreader, well we all
know that it has numerous problems. But if you force me to choose then
I'd have to guess that your incompetence with computers marginally
outweighs your software's deficiencies. It's a tough call.

Ah, so it is the little voices in your head then?

Again you display comprehension problems of gargantuan proportions.

Back up your claims or STFU.

My point exactly, but it is unlikely that you will.

Misdirection won't help you weasel out of this. Back up your claim or STFU.

Again, you are hearing the message, try doing it.

Exactly. You are speaking the message. Try doing it.

Post your PC configuration. Tell us why you didn't transfer your
1.6GHz CPU over to your new RAM endowed motherboard and
save those dollars for an enhanced GFX solution or a much
larger HD.

Can you think of any situation where you might want, or even need,
more CPU horsepower? Perhaps the GFX (graphics for those who are not
keyboard challenged) solution was already more than adequate. Put
your thinking cap on before you write, if you have one.

Finally, an acknowledgement of the reality.

"Finally"??? I've been explaining this to you for years, moron.

You actually don't explain much of anything, you copy and reverse.

Are you talking to and about yourself here, or have I missed
something?

It stands in place of any original thinking on your part.

Please feel free to point out any original thinking on your own part.

Not being an Amigan at the moment is comment enough.

I don't blindly support stupidity like you do.

Ah, now having a ppc based Amiga is stupidity. Good bashing.

It isn't stupidity, but it is nothing to brag about.

Your version of "past indiscretions" is somewhat limited by
your denial over your actions. Remember that "out to get me"
paranoia of yours.

You haven't exactly tried to hide your malicious agenda, TerryTroll.
Anyone who has the audacity to challenge your bull*** gets the same
"Fair Game" policy treatment from you.

Challenge one, prove you had a working Amiga still, timeline 2 full
years.

Why should he do that? He has already done so, and with pictures
which are far more reliable than the words output by WhichAmiga, your
preffered method.

Challenge two, give your pc configuration or the post that
refers to it, if such a post exists, timeline, who knows, Beeton is
a paranoid delusional.

This is an Amiga newsgroup. Why would he want to do that? Why are you
so interested in his PC configuration?

What hypocrisy would that be, little troll? (And BTW, maybe it was
better when you didn't try using any punctuation)

Oh dear, what about your principled stand being shredded by
your casual advice.

WTF are you on about this time, little troll?

Gary "I don't use my copy of Amithlon" Beeton has forgotten
advising someone that they could buy this "illegal" software
from H&P?

He simply stated that it was available from them. He did not
recommend to the original poster that they buy it.

I don't need to see an A1 to know that you are propagating Amiga
disinformation in your statement above.

Really? What exactly is the footprint of AmigaOS?

I don't know. What *is* the footprint of AmigaOS? I assume you are
going to tell us? Wait a minute... no, that is not very likely, as
you probably don't know.

How large a
cache is incorporated on a 750GX CPU?

1MB.

Anybody who has ever used XP on a 1.6 GHz P4 knows that
there is no discernible latency or sluggishness with the UI. None.

Until of course the OS decides to cache RAM to disk or some
other unknown and unfathomable operation takes place.

Sorry, Terry, this statement is just a sad piece of FUD.

By definition, your A1 cannot possible have less
latency or sluggishness than none.

But your XP box can be sluggish, which makes you a totally
unprincipled prevaricator bent on deception.

You don't know anything about his XP box, and your posts have shown
that you know very little about XP. For proof, see the FUD statement
you made above.

Therefore you are lying through your nasty plywood teeth again.

Great, troll lojik at its best.

Terry, is the speak and spell acting up again? Time for a new one?

Are you sure that the current multitasking engine is not suited
to the Amiga desktop?

It was ill-suited for AOS3.x, and AOS4.0 hasn't improved it any. AOS
allows the application to set its own priority in such a way that a
badly written application can cripple the entire system.

And in the real world everyone is running around letting poorly
written applications run on their pc's? Oh. Right.

Business are run on them 24/7, which is more than can be said for that
heap of *** you prefer.

Windows is no bulldozer, I've already said that:

"You've got this gas powered <vs diesel> mini tractor with
98 kazillion permanent attachments that is a foot too wide
and a yard too long to fit in a small side yard. In its defence
however it can sling a bundle of ashphalt shingles right over the
house, dig 3' by 3' post holes and carry 3 gallons of gas."

Your analogy is out to lunch, Terry. There is no place your Amiga can
fit into that any PC cannot also fit. More power makes a computer
*more* versatile, not less.

See above, you do not have a bulldozer in Windows.

Your analogy is, as Gary said, 'out to lunch' and your logic is
fundamentally flawed.

That bulldozer needs a tractor trailer/flatbed to haul it around
even if you do not start it up and only pull the shovel and pick
to work in the sideyard.

Funny, but my PC has roughly the same footprint as your A1. No flatbed
trailers anywhere in sight. What's more, my PC doesn't require a fleet
of support vehicles in order to perform rudimentary tasks.

Flatbed would in this case represent RAM, HD, GFX GPU etc. to
get the OS to the jobsite.

If I am following your verbal garbage properly, this is what *every*
computer does.

As for the overall inherent weakness, a chain is only as strong as
its weakest link and that is why Windows Apps can still take the
whole OS down by freezing the interface in some arcane fashion.

Nope, wrong again. If a Windows application locks up you just end that
task and carry on working.

BuuuuuWHAHAhahahahahahahaha!!!!!

It is true Terry, and your infantile response is proof that you have
not used Windows. You may have posted from a Windows newsreader once,
but your ignorance is immense. I suppose you haven't really used
Linux, BSD, or OS X either.




.

Loading