Re: All the little trolls....

"Gary Beeton" writes:

>tpalfrey wrote:

>> "Gary Beeton" writes:

>> Often it is hard to tell you apart.

>Yet another fine demonstration of your atrocious cognitive skills.

There is nothing wrong with my cognitive skills, I thought I just
explained "noise & echo" to you. Did you not comprehend why you two
are difficult to keep separate?

>> Since you have no experience with the OS version or the hardware
>> you might not be able to understand exactly what this means. Do
>> you remember the speed increase going from an 030 to and
>> 040@40MHz? The extra RAM above 16megs? The scsi II controller on
>> your WE?

>Yes. Nothing special.

You lie like a dog. Or worse still, you just didn't get it.

>> That's the level of improvement seen since update 1 of the
>> developer pre-release embodied in update 2 and now 3.

>Ah, so nothing special then. That's what I thought. Thanks for
>the confirmation.

You are a stubborn and recalcitrant troll. Even when your nose is
rubbed in the poo you still don't get it.

>> Ah yes, it's easy to forget your penchant for hyperbole, but
>> then the "sky is falling" rants are recalled and all is in
>> perspective again.

>BTW, you so very much like using that trite little pre-school "sky
>is falling" reference of yours, but you have never been able to
>explain why. Perhaps you would be so kind as to clue me in by
>providing a message ID, if you can, to one of these so-called
>rants. (IOW, put up or shut up, ***.)

Tut tut, language. Beeton Troll. I explained it very specifically a
long time ago. Labelling you as "chicken little" was a response to
you running all over the newsgroup flapping your tail feathers
about me being some sort of fascist dictator trying to limit your
freedom of speech in an open public forum. Do you remember yet?
You were challenged to put up or shut up and you decided ad hom was
a far better way to go about things rather than prove what you
claimed.

>> Are you telling me that you do so little with your computer that
>> you have never witnessed the phantom tasks that wind down to 0%
>> use when you check to see why the machine has slowed to a crawl
>> then restart sucking resources when you look away?

>Please try to learn to speak English, Terry.

Everyone else understands what I am saying.

>To answer your question, no, that's not what I'm telling you. And
>to answer your innuendo, no, I have never managed to screwed up
>any of my PCs nearly as badly as you regularly have.

So, you don't use your pc for very much of anything then.

>> You're the one who said OS4 wouldn't happen

>Nope, wrong again. I've never said that (feel free to prove me
>wrong if you can).

>> and that the AmigaOne was doomed

>Open your eyes and look around. It is.

>> and never to be released.

>Do you mean I said that AOS4 is never to be released? Well, I'm
>right so far.

You should cut and paste more carefully, you have contradicted
yourself in record time.

>> But look, I have
>> one and it works marvelously. Even you have admitted that
>> however obliquely with your "masses of dissatisfied owners"
>> exagerations.

>One dilutional but happy owner does not a success story make.

Dilution is not the problem. Perhaps you could start using a
dictionary as well as a spell checker on that vaunted pc of yours.

>And yet you are *still* unable to tell us about anything
>productive that you've done with your Amiga. Curious, that.

What's to say, I use it as my main machine, I follow my interests
(which have been presented here time and again) quite handily.

>> Perhaps you, as an ardent supporter and user of UAe,

>I don't use UAE for the same reason that I don't use my A4k, and
>for the same reason that I have no interest in the A1: The OS is
>old, clunky and non-robust, there is no support, there is no
>modern software available, it adds nothing that I can't do
>better, faster, and cheaper on my PC.

Well that neatly ties off any challenge to your UAe expertise
levels. And as a pc advocate you make no supportable points.

>> It doesn't matter which end it comes out of a two headed beast.
>> It's the same message.

>That's because it is the truth.

Your truth is both subjective and situational, like your ethics.

>> Vicarious because you have no firsthand knowledge of what you
>> are talking about. Pessimist because you have killed the Amiga
>> in your mind and will not be persuaded otherwise.

>I am living vicariously off of your advocacy of the A1. That's
>enough to make anybody pessimistic!

See, was it so hard to make that admission? Thank you for
confessing to your lie.

>>>What I have seen been posted in the owners' forums are
>>>too-numerous tales of discontented owners whose A1s have
>>>to be woefully unreliable and under-performing. Why, what do
>>>the owners discuss in the forums on your planet?

>> Oh, so now you are an AmigaOne owner? That's how you access
>> these exclusive forums and various mailing lists.

>Oh boy, more sooper seekrit exclusive Amiga societies! Are Amiga
>owners really that worried that people will find out just how bad
>the A1 really is that they need to keep it secret from
>outsiders?? I have news for you, moron, people already know.

Uhm, delusional, that's the description you are searching for. You
need your OS4 registration number to sign in to those groups. No
"sooper seekrit" conspiracy at all. It's a support forum. You still
have that problem don't you, about being left out because you
cannot provide proof of ownership.

>> Once again your penchant for hyperbole rears its comical head.

>If even just one of the thousand or so A1s on the market failed,
>the percentage would be unacceptably high. Are you saying that
>fewer than one have failed?

Wow, once again a vicious confirmation of Beeton's internal issues.
Perfection being demanded by a WIntel user.

Are you saying that the failures are solely hardware based and not
caused by user error vis a vis PS issues, overclocking, cooling,
shipping damage or improper handling? Please, cite your sources.


Terry
--
The "From:" address has been ROT13d as an antiSPAM measure
.