Re: Compressed modules
- From: Rob Kendrick <nntp@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:36:46 +0100
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:59:49 +0100
"Ste (news)" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
of shared libraries under RISC OS. Perhaps for NetSurf 3.0 we'll
use ELF, but that's of no advantage on RiscPCs due to ROL's refusal
to release a 32 bit OS for them.)
Of course, most of those shared libraries would only be used for
running NetSurf (at least in the short term for the average NetSurf
user) so you'd have to load the same amount of stuff into RAM.
You mean like UnixLib, zlib, libpng, libjpeg, and a load of other
extremely common libraries? I wonder how many statically-linked copies
of libjpeg or libpng there are on the average system!
B.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Compressed modules
- From: Rob Kendrick
- Re: Compressed modules
- References:
- Compressed modules
- From: Simon Willcocks
- Re: Compressed modules
- From: Rob Kendrick
- Re: Compressed modules
- From: John Tytgat
- Re: Compressed modules
- From: chrisbazley
- Re: Compressed modules
- From: Rob Kendrick
- Re: Compressed modules
- From: Ste (news)
- Compressed modules
- Prev by Date: Re: Compressed modules
- Next by Date: Re: Compressed modules
- Previous by thread: Re: Compressed modules
- Next by thread: Re: Compressed modules
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|