Re: The Cartmell threads

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:03:25 +0000, David Pitt wrote:

In message <Qj4Hj.19045$Ff4.6125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Rob Kendrick <nntp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:49:56 +0000, David Pitt wrote:

Cartmell is Cartmell but why anyone ever replies is beyond me.

Because some people trust his nonsense - it must be demonstrated to be
such.

But is doesn't work does it, all that happens is even more rubbish, huge
threads of turgid tosh.

If it lets one more person see the light that Cartmell spouts nonsense,
and not to believe what he says, then that's great.

What I do notice is how low the usenet traffic is, after it has been
de-Cartmellised, I cannot help feeling that all the drivel has driven
people away.

People who have learnt that Cartmell should be killfilled, can killfile
him.

B.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Crackpot/Flake List
    ... Because opinions on who to killfile vary from person to person, ... Real physics students don't ... have a lot of time to waste on nonsense. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: ITV2: D-Tox
    ... so in my killfile you'll stay. ... Dom, I've known you for years but if you think you can blackmail people or ... hurt their feelings with this kind of nonsense, then you are a lesser person ...
    (uk.media.tv.misc)
  • Re: Im sure..
    ... >>> Oops, I accidentally let you out of my killfile and there you are... ... >>> still posting complete nonsense to yourself. ... >> Is that boob STILL spamming the group with nonsense? ...
    (comp.sys.amiga.advocacy)
  • Re: The Cartmell threads
    ... Rob Kendrick wrote: ... Because some people trust his nonsense - it must be demonstrated to be ... Many thanks for this relief. ...
    (comp.sys.acorn.programmer)
  • Re: Stars and Angels on Christmas trees?
    ... of good-faith newsgroup participants by repeatedly defending myself ... against this kind of nonsense. ... with my killfile. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.fandom)