Re: Acknowledging Data Transfer Messages
- From: Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:49:58 +0100
In message <3d006d434f.druck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
druck <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 17 Nov 2007 Steve Fryatt <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I had left the code in situ, but have now found that it seems to confuse
at least one other application (which is happy if the acknowledgement is
disabled). The PRM seems to suggest that it isn't required, but doesn't
say don't do it.
You are making sure you only acknowledge type 18s, some may be using
17s and not expect an ack.
Not really necessary. The sender of the original message does not see
the acknowledgemenet anyway, it is the other way round: The original
sender gets an Ack message when a recorded message was neither
acknowledged nor replied to. So, acknowledging a type 17 message
simply has no effect, and the same goes for acknowledging a message
that the program subsequently replies to.
Martin
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Wuerthner MW Software http://www.mw-software.com/
ArtWorks 2 -- Designing stunning graphics has never been easier
spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [replace "spamtrap" by "info" to reply]
.
- References:
- Acknowledging Data Transfer Messages
- From: Steve Fryatt
- Re: Acknowledging Data Transfer Messages
- From: druck
- Acknowledging Data Transfer Messages
- Prev by Date: Re: cURL on Iyonix
- Next by Date: Re: cURL on Iyonix
- Previous by thread: Re: Acknowledging Data Transfer Messages
- Next by thread: Re: Acknowledging Data Transfer Messages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|