Re: Choice of Language
- From: Ben Shimmin <bas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:58:17 +0100
Paul Vigay <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
In article <slrn.2006-07-21.00-01-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Ben Shimmin <bas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...but this is totally untrue; Emacs, vi, TextWrangler, BBEdit, or
TextMate are all decent text editors.
You /ARE/ having a laugh??? None of those are even a patch on StrongED,
let alone Zap.
Curious. Emacs and vi have been the editors of choice for people far
smarter than you and me for many, many years.
The best editor I've found so far was Pepper - and that's no longer
developed and didn't work correctly on the latest OS X versions.
BBEdit is a silly price for a text editor anyway - it's more than
full-blown document processors on RISC OS.
TextWrangler, its little brother, is very capable and is now free.
b.
--
<bas@xxxxxxxxx> <URL:http://bas.me.uk/>
`The machinations of ambiguity are among the very roots of poetry.'
-- William Empson, _Seven Types Of Ambiguity_
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Choice of Language
- From: Peter Naulls
- Re: Choice of Language
- References:
- Choice of Language
- From: Rebecca L MacGregor
- Re: Choice of Language
- From: Chris Hall
- Re: Choice of Language
- From: druck
- Re: Choice of Language
- From: Ste (news)
- Re: Choice of Language
- From: druck
- Re: Choice of Language
- From: Peter Naulls
- Re: Choice of Language
- From: Peter Naulls
- Re: Choice of Language
- From: Ben Shimmin
- Choice of Language
- Prev by Date: Re: Choice of Language
- Next by Date: Re: Choice of Language
- Previous by thread: Re: Choice of Language
- Next by thread: Re: Choice of Language
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading