Re: Drobe inaccuracies

In article <0099994b4f.druck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
druck <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3 Dec 2007 John Cartmell <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <47534b61$0$13938$fa0fcedb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Rob Kendrick <nntp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not going to play snipping games with you - one cannot win against a
grand master of spin and misinterpret.

You *are* playing snipping games with me. You are snipping my comments in
order to reverse their meaning. That is lying.

In thats case what do you call this?

My message:-
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.hardware/msg/b5172318c81971d8?

This childish travesty of quoting:-
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.hardware/msg/7a830375d8d967c9?

Look again. You had done exactly the same as Rob and quoted so far out of
context that you had reversed the meaning. The new message became yours - even
though you (falsely) claimed it to be mine. Just like Rob is responsible for
that criticism of drobe - so you are responsible for the criticism of Castle.
It wasn't my criticism, it first saw the light of day in your posting (though
you ascribed it to me) and you were very upset at rightly being called its
author. Your doing. Your problem.

You are a blantant hypocrite.

Certainly not. I never pretended that the idea was yours. I said that I didn't
know where you got the idea from as you were the only person discussing it. I
confirmed that the statement that you 'quoted' wasn't true.

If simply making you responsible for the misquotes that you use upsets you
then think how angry I must be when you actually claim that I've said the
opposite of what I've thought and said.

--
John
.

Relevant Pages
Loading