Re: Help/advice - basic image processing question
- From: Rob Kendrick <nntp@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:46:54 +0100
Chris Evans wrote:
http://home.vigay.com/photos/06-07-24/photo05.html is pretty bad at the
top left corner of the stones. Good pictures though. :)
Are you refering to what I call the Aura effect?
Or is that just a mystical presence!
I assume so - this is caused by the way JPEG works. At a basic level,
it divides the image up into many small square regions and encodes them
separately. If a square overlaps a region with two very different types
of content (in this case, the clear blue sky [easily compressible] and
the stone [less so]) it can't compress as efficiently, and as such that
square looses more apparent quality than the others, thus the artefacts
that are easily visible and distracting.
B.
.
- References:
- Help/advice - basic image processing question
- From: Roger Hird
- Re: Help/advice - basic image processing question
- From: Russell Hafter News
- Re: Help/advice - basic image processing question
- From: Alan Calder
- Re: Help/advice - basic image processing question
- From: John Cartmell
- Re: Help/advice - basic image processing question
- From: Ollie Clark
- Re: Help/advice - basic image processing question
- From: Chris Evans
- Help/advice - basic image processing question
- Prev by Date: Re: Help/advice - basic image processing question
- Next by Date: Another USB device
- Previous by thread: Re: Help/advice - basic image processing question
- Next by thread: Re: Help/advice - basic image processing question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|