Re: A9 Home
- From: John Cartmell <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 01:19:31 +0000 (GMT)
In article <993782464f.druck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, druck <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 23 Nov 2007 John Cartmell <a9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As I understand it, to say a machine offers USB 2 support means that it
can cope with the high speed as well as the rest of the protocol - even
though that high speed will rarely (if ever) be needed.
You don't understand it, which is why you are writing utter nonsense.
I don't know where the Iyonix stands with this but, although the A9
offers the equivalent of USB 2 support (to the extent that you say), it
cannot claim full full USB support even if users get exactly the same
performance for the devices they actually use as they would with a
machine labelled 'USB 2 support provided'.
This is pure FUD.
You have snipped the context without acknowledgement (my second paragraph in
particular requires that context) and missed the corrections that you imply
are needed. In context my comments are correct.
--
John Cartmell john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 0845 006 8822 or 0161 969 9820
Qercus magazine FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527 www.qercus.com
Qercus - the best guide to RISC OS computing
.
- References:
- A9 Home
- From: The Architect
- Re: A9 Home
- From: Steffen Huber
- Re: A9 Home
- From: Paul Stewart
- Re: A9 Home
- From: Ray Dawson
- Re: A9 Home
- From: Paul Stewart
- Re: A9 Home
- From: Ray Dawson
- Re: A9 Home
- From: Paul Stewart
- Re: A9 Home
- From: John Cartmell
- Re: A9 Home
- From: druck
- A9 Home
- Prev by Date: Re: A9 Home
- Next by Date: Re: A9 Home
- Previous by thread: Re: A9 Home
- Next by thread: Re: A9 Home
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|