Re: Failure of on-line payment

druck wrote:
On 20 Jan 2009 Peter Naulls <peter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Of course, I've explained this all before, so your
responses are a bit of a mystery to me. And please, do
some research and give me some references before you bang
out a reply to this - thanks.

I don't need to, all that is irrelevant, the crux of the matter the RO port just doesn't do the things people need it to do.

You had, and still have the power to do something about that. Sorry
that you think that accuracy is "irrelevant". Something very
you-know-who about that attitude.

I can't tell people to carry on waiting an hoping that will change,
so I'm suggesting a practical solution.

None of that excuses your misinformation, any more than those
who did similarly and you have lambasted over the years for
similar.

As for what's practical, that's a matter of opinion, yours
no less valid in this case; but you're not doing yourself
or those you advise any favours here by not being accurate.

.

Relevant Pages
Loading