Re: PhotoFiler is now freeware + source included
- From: Robert Seago <rjseago@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:07:49 +0000 (GMT)
In article <4f6de7e770steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Ste (news) <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <4f6dd98f5bSW_NOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stuart
<SW_NOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't use it much because it slows everything down but it's usefull
ocasionally.
It seems _very_ slow on my IYONIX; taking something like ten seconds per
photo in a directory with a hundred photos - that's not good (plus they
all look corrupt in the thumbnails anyway). I'm glad I didn't pay for it
:) I suppose I'll have to stick with Thump for the time being. :(
Steve
I tried it and it seemed pretty quick on the pics I tried. I suspect it
is those jpegs which have the integral thumbnail, which are quite quick.
--
Regards from Bob Seago: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/rjseago/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PhotoFiler is now freeware + source included
- From: David Thomas
- Re: PhotoFiler is now freeware + source included
- From: Dr Peter Young
- Re: PhotoFiler is now freeware + source included
- References:
- Re: PhotoFiler is now freeware + source included
- From: Dr Peter Young
- Re: PhotoFiler is now freeware + source included
- From: Stuart
- Re: PhotoFiler is now freeware + source included
- From: Ste (news)
- Re: PhotoFiler is now freeware + source included
- Prev by Date: MPro/Iconclipboard conflict?
- Next by Date: Re: PhotoFiler is now freeware + source included
- Previous by thread: Re: PhotoFiler is now freeware + source included
- Next by thread: Re: PhotoFiler is now freeware + source included
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|