Re: Disputes on this and other RISCOS Groups
- From: Darren Salt <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 14:45:27 +0100
I demand that Alan Calder may or may not have written...
In article <4ee23f6940UCEbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Williams (News)[snip]
<UCEbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Your non-proportional fonts will also contain these as conventional
characters, as they are designed for word-processing. I really meant /my/
non-proportional font, which is a clearer (IMHO) version of the system
font.
Try system and you'll see what I mean.
Thanks for the explanation but it still doesn't work. Change my alternate
font to System from Corpus Medium and although I get a horrible display
(you *really* like it like that?) still no sign of any strange characters
of any kind. Can it be that the font you are using is non-standard in some
way?
The problem is that the headers in question claim that the character set in
use is ISO8859-1, but ? and ? are not defined in ISO8859-1. They are,
therefore, undefined and, as such, are allowed to do things such as causing
nasal demons.
What's likely, though, is that they'll be displayed using replacement
"undefined" glyphs, or they'll be displayed "as is". If the latter, *and* the
font in use happens to be a sufficiently-complete Acorn Extended Latin-1,
they'll appear as intended.
(This posting claims to be encoded as ISO8859-1. Due to those two characters,
it isn't.)
--
| Darren Salt | d @ youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| RISC OS, Linux | s zap,tartarus,org | Northumberland | Army
| Kill all extremists!
The pen is mightier than the pencil.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Disputes on this and other RISCOS Groups
- From: druck
- Re: Disputes on this and other RISCOS Groups
- References:
- Disputes on this and other RISCOS Groups
- From: Timothy Hartley
- Re: Disputes on this and other RISCOS Groups
- From: Alan Leighton
- Re: Disputes on this and other RISCOS Groups
- From: David Pitt
- Re: Disputes on this and other RISCOS Groups
- From: Alan Calder
- Re: Disputes on this and other RISCOS Groups
- From: Alan Calder
- Disputes on this and other RISCOS Groups
- Prev by Date: Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- Next by Date: Re: Disputes on this and other RISCOS Groups
- Previous by thread: Re: Disputes on this and other RISCOS Groups
- Next by thread: Re: Disputes on this and other RISCOS Groups
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|