Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: John Cartmell <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 21:52:53 +0100
In article <gemini.jhmgro00arm1101vo.ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Ray Dawson <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Cartmell <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <091d6fde4e.druck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
druck <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Perhapse if you could actually bring yourself to quote more than 2
words out of my post
Perhaps generally only has one 'e' and it's bad form to use the number 2
(rather than the word two) like that. But before you go round in circles
too fast you might like to consider the bits I didn't comment on. Do you
*really* want me to show the depth of your ignorance - or will you just
sit back and accept that I accept that you probably don't agree. But who
cares - and does it really matter?
Perhaps you should read your own posts before shooting yourself in the
foot by commenting on others' typos.
The comment was actually to get druck to appreciate that he had quoted
something that was a year out of date - and arguably destroyed his argument.
It does make it hard when you have to explain it all in such simple steps. ;-(
Read what you wrote above and correct it before someone else more literate
does it for you.
Don't worry Ray, I'm sure you won't attempt the task: you have a track record
of such complaints without risking a 'correction'.
Being pedantic you might insist on 'Perhaps' rather than Perhaps. Perhaps you
are also struggling to notice the reference to druck being wound up, or that,
unlike druck, I accept that our views can differ without contradiction? For
some reason you obviously care (why?) but do you understand why I say that
druck's typos really don't matter - except to signal that he hasn't got the
slightest idea what he is arguing about - except that he wants to say that
he's 'agin' me?
--
John Cartmell john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 0845 006 8822 or 0161 969 9820
Qercus magazine FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527 www.finnybank.com
Qercus - the best guide to RISC OS computing
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: druck
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- References:
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: Steven Pampling
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: John Cartmell
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: Ams
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: John Cartmell
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: Ams
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: John Cartmell
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: Steven Pampling
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: John Cartmell
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: Nick Roberts
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: John Cartmell
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: druck
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: John Cartmell
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: druck
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: John Cartmell
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- From: Ray Dawson
- Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- Prev by Date: Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- Next by Date: Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- Previous by thread: Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- Next by thread: Re: To Upgrade or Not. What's the difference?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|