Re: Q Re !Scrap
- From: Graeme Wall <Graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:27:45 +0000
In message <4de14e6679UCEbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article <19f84de14d.Brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Brian Howlett <news-spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > *Should* being the operative word - there are a number of badly behaved
> > applications which do leave files permanently in Scrap, and will
> > complain / not work if they are removed.
>
> Terry is not a Pic_Index subscriber, but if he were he would experience a
> slightly longer loading time the next time he used it after clearing scrap,
> as Pic_Index uses scrap to save loading time by storing some
> ready-processed stuff there.
Shouldn't that be stored in Choices?
--
Graeme Wall
My genealogy website:
<http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/genealogy/index.html>
.
- References:
- Q Re !Scrap
- From: Terry Duell
- Re: Q Re !Scrap
- From: Brian Howlett
- Q Re !Scrap
- Prev by Date: Re: Q Re !Scrap
- Next by Date: Re: A Challenge?
- Previous by thread: Re: Q Re !Scrap
- Next by thread: Re: Q Re !Scrap
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|