Re: OFT website update
- From: Tarquin Mills <person@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:23:58 GMT
In message <n_VNg.513$Ij.403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Peter Naulls wrote:
Tarquin Mills wrote:
Peter Naulls wrote:
I am not responsible for the Office of Fair Trading's unsecure email
alerts system, they are.
So tell us, do you deny any and all connection to the OFT website
including its use, and subscribing to its notifications system?
I am not connected to the OFT website in any way, and have not
subscribed myself or any RISC OS supporters to their notifications
system.
Do you not think this "spamming", regardless of its exact origins,
is a direct or indirect result of your nonsense?
If by nonsense you mean campaigning against the Wintel monopoly, yes.
--
The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) should start an investigation
into Microsoft's monopoly, http://www.petitiononline.com/oftsucks/
Reboot Movement (An Anti-Wintel Campaign), http://www.rebootmovement.org.uk
Court case complete, http://www.windowshaters.co.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OFT website update
- From: druck
- Re: OFT website update
- From: Steven Pampling
- Re: OFT website update
- References:
- OFT website update
- From: webeditor
- Re: OFT website update
- From: Tarquin Mills
- Re: OFT website update
- From: Theo Markettos
- Re: OFT website update
- From: Peter Naulls
- Re: OFT website update
- From: greg
- Re: OFT website update
- From: Tarquin Mills
- Re: OFT website update
- From: Peter Naulls
- Re: OFT website update
- From: Tarquin Mills
- Re: OFT website update
- From: Peter Naulls
- OFT website update
- Prev by Date: Re: OFT website update
- Next by Date: Re: OFT website update
- Previous by thread: Re: OFT website update
- Next by thread: Re: OFT website update
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|