comp.std.c

• Date Index

---

• mb character conversion and null (wide) character, Jun Woong
  • Re: mb character conversion and null (wide) character, Jun Woong
  • Re: mb character conversion and null (wide) character, David R Tribble
    • Re: mb character conversion and null (wide) character, Jonathan Leffler
    • Re: mb character conversion and null (wide) character, Richard Tobin
  • Re: mb character conversion and null (wide) character, Jun Woong
  • Re: mb character conversion and null (wide) character, Antoine Leca
    • Re: mb character conversion and null (wide) character, Jun Woong
      • Re: mb character conversion and null (wide) character, Antoine Leca
  • Re: mb character conversion and null (wide) character, Douglas A. Gwyn
• c, java, cobol, davidboon28
• c, java cobol know more, davidboon28
• trying to figure out.., joselandslide
• about graphics, prince
  • Re: about graphics, Francis Glassborow
  • Re: about graphics, Eric Sosman
    • Re: about graphics, cr88192
      • Re: about graphics, Jeff Schwab
      • Re: about graphics, cr88192
      • Re: about graphics, Jeff Schwab
      • Re: about graphics, cr88192
      • Re: about graphics, David R Tribble
  • Re: about graphics, Martin
    • Re: about graphics, Douglas A. Gwyn
• DR006 and strtol, Jun Woong
  • Re: DR006 and strtol, Keith Thompson
    • Re: DR006 and strtol, Randy Howard
    • Re: DR006 and strtol, Jun Woong
      • Re: DR006 and strtol, Keith Thompson
  • Re: DR006 and strtol, lawrence . jones
    • Re: DR006 and strtol, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: DR006 and strtol, lawrence . jones
      • Re: DR006 and strtol, Martin Str|mberg
      • Re: DR006 and strtol, Jun Woong
      • Re: DR006 and strtol, Antoine Leca
      • Re: DR006 and strtol, lawrence . jones
• tricky output ??, onkar
  • Re: tricky output ??, Ian Collins
  • Re: tricky output ??, Keith Thompson
  • Re: tricky output ??, Francis Glassborow
• Operator overloading proposal, jacob navia
• Evaluating unary *, Peter Nilsson
  • Re: Evaluating unary *, cr88192
    • Re: Evaluating unary *, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, cr88192
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, cr88192
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: Evaluating unary *, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Jeff Schwab
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, cr88192
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, cr88192
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, James Kuyper
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Vincent Lefevre
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, James Kuyper
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, cr88192
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, cr88192
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, James Kuyper
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, jameskuyper
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, cr88192
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, cr88192
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, cr88192
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Antoine Leca
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Jeff Schwab
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Martin
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Antoine Leca
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Jeff Schwab
      • &array [Was: Evaluating unary *], Antoine Leca
      • Re: &array [Was: Evaluating unary *], Keith Thompson
      • Re: &array [Was: Evaluating unary *], lawrence . jones
      • Re: &array [Was: Evaluating unary *], Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: &array [Was: Evaluating unary *], Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: &array [Was: Evaluating unary *], Antoine Leca
  • Re: Evaluating unary *, Antoine Leca
    • Re: Evaluating unary *, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Evaluating unary *, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: Evaluating unary *, Douglas A. Gwyn
• "available for further allocation"?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: "available for further allocation"?, cr88192
    • Re: "available for further allocation"?, Charlie Gordon
      • Re: "available for further allocation"?, cr88192
      • Re: "available for further allocation"?, Charlie Gordon
      • Re: "available for further allocation"?, cr88192
      • Re: "available for further allocation"?, Antoine Leca
      • Re: "available for further allocation"?, Charlie Gordon
      • Re: "available for further allocation"?, cr88192
      • Re: "available for further allocation"?, Antoine Leca
      • Re: "available for further allocation"?, Ian Collins
      • Re: "available for further allocation"?, Charlie Gordon
  • Re: "available for further allocation"?, jacob navia
    • Re: "available for further allocation"?, Francis Glassborow
    • Re: "available for further allocation"?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: "available for further allocation"?, David R Tribble
  • Re: "available for further allocation"?, Douglas A. Gwyn
• type names, cr88192
  • Re: type names, Keith Thompson
    • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, Keith Thompson
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, Francis Glassborow
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, Francis Glassborow
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, Charlie Gordon
      • Re: type names, those who know me have no need of my name
      • Re: type names, Charlie Gordon
      • Re: type names, Keith Thompson
      • Re: type names, Francis Glassborow
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, Francis Glassborow
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, Francis Glassborow
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, David Thompson
      • Re: type names, David Wagner
      • Re: type names, Jeff Schwab
      • Re: type names, Charlie Gordon
  • Re: type names, those who know me have no need of my name
    • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, Richard Bos
      • Re: type names, cr88192
  • Re: type names, David R Tribble
    • Re: type names, cr88192
    • Re: type names, Francis Glassborow
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, Francis Glassborow
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, Keith Thompson
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, jl
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, jl
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, jacob navia
      • Re: type names, Keith Thompson
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, Richard Bos
      • Re: type names, jacob navia
      • Re: type names, santosh
      • Re: type names, jacob navia
      • Re: type names, Flash Gordon
      • Re: type names, Keith Thompson
      • Re: type names, Richard Bos
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, jacob navia
      • Re: type names, Jonathan Leffler
      • Re: type names, jacob navia
      • Re: type names, Flash Gordon
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, comp.std.c
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, jacob navia
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, jacob navia
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, jacob navia
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, jacob navia
      • Re: type names, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: type names, Hartmut Brandt
      • Re: type names, jacob navia
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, jl
      • Re: type names, jl
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, Francis Glassborow
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, jacob navia
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, Wojtek Lerch
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, Wojtek Lerch
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, jl
      • Re: type names, Wojtek Lerch
      • Re: type names, lawrence . jones
      • Re: type names, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, lawrence . jones
      • Re: type names, Wojtek Lerch
      • Re: type names, lawrence . jones
      • Re: type names, Wojtek Lerch
      • Re: type names, jacob navia
      • Re: type names, jl
      • Re: type names, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, Francis Glassborow
      • Re: type names, jacob navia
      • Re: type names, Charlie Gordon
      • Re: type names, those who know me have no need of my name
      • Re: type names, cr88192
      • Re: type names, David Tanguay
      • Re: type names, Charlie Gordon
      • Re: type names, David R Tribble
• Future plan in your life :, sahilla
• external inline functions calling static inline functions, jonathan
  • Re: external inline functions calling static inline functions, Douglas A. Gwyn
• different results from different scanf implementations, Jun Woong
  • Re: different results from different scanf implementations, lawrence . jones
  • Re: different results from different scanf implementations, Hallvard B Furuseth
    • Re: different results from different scanf implementations, Jun Woong
      • Re: different results from different scanf implementations, Hallvard B Furuseth
• Why did C99 retain getc as a macro?, Ian Collins
  • Re: Why did C99 retain getc as a macro?, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Why did C99 retain getc as a macro?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Why did C99 retain getc as a macro?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Why did C99 retain getc as a macro?, David R Tribble
  • Re: Why did C99 retain getc as a macro?, Douglas A. Gwyn
  • Re: Why did C99 retain getc as a macro?, David R Tribble
• isnan(complex) --> ???, jacob navia
  • Re: isnan(complex) --> ???, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: isnan(complex) --> ???, jacob navia
  • Re: isnan(complex) --> ???, Geoff
    • Re: isnan(complex) --> ???, jacob navia
    • Re: isnan(complex) --> ???, Keith Thompson
      • Re: isnan(complex) --> ???, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: isnan(complex) --> ???, Charlie Gordon
      • Re: isnan(complex) --> ???, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: isnan(complex) --> ???, jacob navia
• Updated version of "The New C Standard" book available, Derek M. Jones
  • Re: Updated version of "The New C Standard" book available, Charlie Gordon
    • Re: Updated version of "The New C Standard" book available, Derek M. Jones
      • Re: Updated version of "The New C Standard" book available, Charlie Gordon
      • Re: Updated version of "The New C Standard" book available, Jonathan Leffler
      • Re: Updated version of "The New C Standard" book available, Derek M. Jones
  • Re: Updated version of "The New C Standard" book available, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: Updated version of "The New C Standard" book available, Derek M. Jones
      • Re: Updated version of "The New C Standard" book available, Neil Booth
      • Re: Updated version of "The New C Standard" book available, Neil Booth
      • Re: Updated version of "The New C Standard" book available, Derek M. Jones
      • Re: Updated version of "The New C Standard" book available, Neil Booth
      • Re: Updated version of "The New C Standard" book available, Derek M. Jones
      • Re: Updated version of "The New C Standard" book available, Harald van Dijk
• Re: Conformance, cr88192
  • Re: Conformance, James Kuyper
    • Re: Conformance, cr88192
    • Re: Conformance, Charlie Gordon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Conformance, Antoine Leca
    • Re: Conformance, Francis Glassborow
  • Re: Conformance, James Kuyper
    • Re: Conformance, cr88192
    • Re: Conformance, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Conformance, cr88192
    • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, jameskuyper
      • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Conformance, James Kuyper
      • Re: Conformance, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Conformance, Francis Glassborow
      • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, cr88192
      • Re: Conformance, Charlie Gordon
      • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Conformance, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Conformance, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Conformance, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Conformance, Francis Glassborow
      • Re: Conformance, Jonathan Coxhead
      • Re: Conformance, Ian Collins
      • Re: Conformance, Charlie Gordon
      • Re: Conformance, Ian Collins
      • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, Ian Collins
      • Re: Conformance, Francis Glassborow
      • Re: Conformance, jacob navia
      • Re: Conformance, Charlie Gordon
      • Re: Conformance, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Conformance, Charlie Gordon
      • Re: Conformance, Douglas A. Gwyn
      • Re: Conformance, Francis Glassborow
      • Re: Conformance, cr88192
  • Re: Conformance, James Kuyper

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Comp  > comp.std.c  > 2008-02