Re: queries about sprintf

"Robert Gamble" <rgamble99@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Tim Rentsch wrote:
>[snip]
> > In general I think your reasoning here is good. The specific
> > case, though, of char*/void* is covered by normative text in
> > sections 6.5.2.2 p6 and 7.5.1.1 p2.
>
> 7.15.1.1 p2.

PS - Thank you Robert for the correction.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Seed
    ... Some people get the word correction mixed up with bashing. ... ignorant and believing a ball face lie. ... from eternal hell. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Seed
    ... < Bo Derek ruined my life! ... Some people get the word correction mixed up with bashing. ... from eternal hell. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Robert Best is best on Noah (historical figure) and the Flood (local)
    ... from the Robert Best website on archaeology per se. ... backed up be Best's archaeology and entire reconstruction. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Robert Best is best on Noah (historical figure) and the Flood (local)
    ... from the Robert Best website on archaeology per se. ... backed up be Best's archaeology and entire reconstruction. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Being Objective
    ... <snip Glenn's missing the point> ... Conclusion, proposition, affirmation, denial, assertion, are all ... expressions of belief, Von. ... You have claimed that conclusions are operations of reasoning and do ...
    (talk.origins)