Re: Can gray image’ pixel value be negative?
- From: "Dave Robinson" <dave.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:49:02 +0000 (UTC)
"John D'Errico" <woodchips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message <gb7rtl$1ub$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
lijing <verylijing@xxxxxxx> wrote in message <1aeb3683-1e4d-4b5f-ad51-116d3d71527a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
Want to normalize an gray image to zero mean and unit variance, but
now I wonder could a gray image=92 pixel value be negative? I have never
seen. Could you give some explanation?
Thank you for your attention! Thank you for your replay!
A zero mean would imply that some values are
positive and some negative. This is inherent in
the definition of the mean, unless all of the
values are identically zero.
So why are you even remotely surprised at this
result?
John
Once you have undertaken a zero mean transformation on your greyscale image, it is no longer an image in the conventional sense, it is merely a two dimensional numerical matrix containing both positive and negative values, which - if you have done your arithmetic correctly - should sum to zero.
Regards
Dave Robinson
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can gray image’ pixel value be negative?
- From: Walter Roberson
- Re: Can gray image’ pixel value be negative?
- References:
- Can gray image’ pixel value be negative?
- From: lijing
- Re: Can gray image’ pixel value be negative?
- From: John D'Errico
- Can gray image’ pixel value be negative?
- Prev by Date: Filtering based on blob analysis
- Next by Date: Re: Reducing fill-ins when factoring sparse symmetric positive definite matrix
- Previous by thread: Re: Can gray image’ pixel value be negative?
- Next by thread: Re: Can gray image’ pixel value be negative?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading