Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- From: Rune Allnor <allnor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
On 17 Jun, 02:31, "Steven G. Johnson" <stev...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You apparently want the poster to do the Fourier integral by finding
all the poles in the complex plane (or at least in half of it) by your
favorite method (Ivansson's) and using the residue theorem.
Not 'want', just point out to the OP that this is a
last-resort option. Before I posted that suggestion
others had spent a long time trying to get the OP to
state in sufficient detail exactly what type of intergral
he was up against, with little success as far as I could
see.
....
Sorry I reacted badly to your post,
No problem.
Rune
.
- References:
- Writing our own low level m-file
- From: OR Stats
- Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- From: dpb
- Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- From: OR Stats
- Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- From: Scott Seidman
- Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- From: OR Stats
- Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- From: dpb
- Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- From: OR Stats
- Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- From: Rune Allnor
- Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- From: Steven G. Johnson
- Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- From: Rune Allnor
- Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- From: Steven G. Johnson
- Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- From: Rune Allnor
- Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- From: Steven G. Johnson
- Writing our own low level m-file
- Prev by Date: Resizing an Image stack
- Next by Date: Solving a PDE system
- Previous by thread: Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- Next by thread: Re: Writing our own low level m-file
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading