Re: 64-bit : Vista vs Linux
- From: "Suresh " <sureshn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:33:01 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Yi,
Actually the benchmark shows that the 2 machines should be
very similar.
Suresh
"Yi Cao" <y.cao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
<fulpra$k3f$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
"Suresh " <sureshn@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message <fulolp$982
$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
Hi Peter,direct factor in
You are right about the memory being faster and that is a
what I am doing. But still I cannot explain a factor of 2in speed other than
the fact the Linux OS handles resources much better thanWindows.
FSB 4 MB L2
Vista Hardware:
Dual-Core Intel? Xeon? Processor 5160 3.00 GHz 1333 MHz
cache EX615AVFSB 4 MB L2
Dual-Core Intel? Xeon? Processor 5160 3.00 GHz 1333 MHz
cache (2nd) EX616AVdoing
HP 8GB (4x2GB) DDR2-667 ECC FBD RK355AV
HP 250GB SATA 3Gb/s NCQ 7200 (1st) EM060AV
Linux Hardware:
2.33 GHz Intel Core Duo
8 GB DDR2-8 MHz RAM
Hard disk same speed as well as capacity.
Thanks.
Suresh
Peter Boettcher <boettcher@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
<muyfxtd98np.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
"Suresh " <sureshn@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the post.
The hardware details are:
Vista Hardware:
2 x Intel dual core Xeon 3.0 GHZ
8 GB 667 MHz RAM
Hard disk: SATA
Linux hardware:
1 x Intel Core Duo 2.33 GHz
8 GB 800 MHz RAM
Hard disk: SATA (similar specs)
The RAM speeds are probably a big deal, since you are
single 7200rpm hardmemory-intensive work.
For the disks, when you say similar specs, you mean
can matter, sincedrives on each system? Same capacities? This stuff
platters in thedifferent capacities often mean different number of
media.physical drive, which can change throughput to the
detail. Intel has
Processors, also getting there, but still not enough
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Xeon_microprocesscalled many processors "Xeon" over the years.
ors
of which would
I think you probaby have a Paxville or Tulsa core, both
benchmarks.be based on the NetBurst architecture, which was lousy.
Really, the only way to track this stuff down is via
bad for this.Benchmark the processors alone. MATLAB bench is not
Benchmark the disks alone. Etc.
-Peter
How about MATLAB bench results? Do you still get a factor
of 2 performance difference?
Yi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 64-bit : Vista vs Linux
- From: Peter Boettcher
- Re: 64-bit : Vista vs Linux
- References:
- 64-bit : Vista vs Linux
- From: Suresh
- Re: 64-bit : Vista vs Linux
- From: Peter Boettcher
- Re: 64-bit : Vista vs Linux
- From: Suresh
- Re: 64-bit : Vista vs Linux
- From: Yi Cao
- 64-bit : Vista vs Linux
- Prev by Date: recursive algorithms in SIMULINK
- Next by Date: Re: round off errors
- Previous by thread: Re: 64-bit : Vista vs Linux
- Next by thread: Re: 64-bit : Vista vs Linux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|