Re: Purely real result of IFFT
- From: Randy Poe <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:41:19 -0700
On Oct 4, 1:07 pm, "David Doria" <daviddo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ok that tells me that I came to the correct conclusion, but
here is a bit further question
I thought the sum in the IDFT was from k = -N/2 to N/2, but
here it is from k=0 to N-1
if you assume that Xk is a complex number (a+bi), and use
Eulers formula to get cos(2*pi*j*k*n/N) + i*sin(2*pi*j*k*n/N)
you can show that if X(k) = X(-k)* then all the imaginary
terms cancel. This doesn't work if there are never negative
numbers in the exponent. How could you show this property
using k = 0 to N-1 ??
The DFT is periodic, with period N.
X(k) = sum( n=0,N-1 ) exp(j*2*pi*k*n/N) * x(n)
X(k+N) = sum(n=0,N-1) x(n)*exp[j*2*pi*(k+N)*n/N]
= sum(n=0,N-1) x(n)*exp[j*2*pi*k*n/N] exp[j*2*pi*n*N/N]
= sum(n=0,N-1) x(n)*exp[j*2*pi*k*n/N]
= X(k)
So X(-k) = X(N - k)
- Randy
.
- References:
- Purely real result of IFFT
- From: David Doria
- Re: Purely real result of IFFT
- From: David Doria
- Purely real result of IFFT
- Prev by Date: Re: Purely real result of IFFT
- Next by Date: Re: automatic dispatch for sparse input?
- Previous by thread: Re: Purely real result of IFFT
- Next by thread: Re: Purely real result of IFFT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|