now that was interesting
- From: Mihi <mihi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:59:23 -0400
That was quite a competition at the end :)
Grats to the cyclist.
The entry which is puzzling me most is the algorithm from Hannes
Naudé & Cobus Potgieter, which shows some strange runtime behaviour
:) (especially Probulator VI). On my laptop this algorithm is even
slower than the original one from markus but on the test machine it
seems to be blazingly fast :) (this may depend on the actual data in
the testsuites) The funny thing is I tried out their entry and
disregarded it as to slow to become a competition (oh how wrong I?ve
been :) ). Otherwise I would have tried to make a last minute merger
of my changes with theirs.
The human readable version of my entries came in at place 20 <http://www.mathworks.com/contest/blockbuster.cgi/view_submission.html?id=31882>
and is almost as fast as the obfuscated ones (or am I to stupid to
obfuscate properly for matlab? :) ).
Another interesting thing is the chaotic reaction of all leading
entries towards small changes of the parameters, something that has
to be kept in mind for real world applications.
Last but not least there are some things I would like to see in
future matlab contests:
1. longer twilight phase, since this is usually the phase where the
major algorithmic ideas are developed.
2. a limit of entries one person can post in a certain timeframe
(lets say 10/hour), which may be lifted on the last day to give the
tweakers some time to play around :)
3. clear rules on obfuscation or at least a default obfuscator
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: now that was interesting
- From: David Jones
- Re: now that was interesting
- From: Markus
- Re: now that was interesting
- From: Yi Cao
- Re: now that was interesting
- References:
- Re: Too late
- From: Mihi
- Re: Too late
- From: Rick St.Pierre
- Re: Too late
- From: Hannes Naudé
- nthroot and .^
- From: Yi Cao
- Re: nthroot and .^
- From: Stijn Helsen
- Re: Too late
- Prev by Date: Re: Double to int
- Next by Date: Parsing CSV's
- Previous by thread: Re: nthroot and .^
- Next by thread: Re: now that was interesting
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|