Re: K-means and SOM
- From: "Greg Heath" <heath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Oct 2005 14:20:10 -0700
Greg Heath wrote:
> Thiru wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to know, in what way clustering achieved by K-means is
> > different from that of SOMs.
>
> Impossible to answer. In general, there are several K-means objective
> functions and tens of versions of K-means algorithms. Some are
> deterministic and some are probabilistic (especially w.r.t. initial
> conditions). Each one will yield a different configuration.
>
> Sorry, I don't have MATLAB on this machine, so I can't get specific
> about the options available with the MATLAB version.
>
> If you are looking for a 2 or 3 dimensional visualization
> of the data, Kohonen recommends SOM with a gradually shrinking
> neighborhood. Otherwise he recommends K-means, which is
> equivalent to SOM without neighborhood shrinking.
>
> Personally, I have found faster visualizations by first obtaining
> clusters using K-means, then obtaining a 2 or 3 dimensional
> visualization using Sammon's algorithm on the cluster centers.
>
> You'll have to search for that algorithm, I don't have it anymore.
I just went to Google Groups and got 57 hits on
sammons algorithm
Hope this helps.
Greg
> If you are in a hurry, a linear approximation to the nonlinear results
> of SOM and Sammon can be obtained by just projecting the
> data on the dominant principal component plane. However, for
> complicated data, the results may be very different.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Greg
.
- References:
- K-means and SOM
- From: Thiru
- Re: K-means and SOM
- From: Greg Heath
- K-means and SOM
- Prev by Date: Re: K-means and SOM
- Next by Date: Re: Error in pol2cart?
- Previous by thread: Re: K-means and SOM
- Next by thread: How to use Simulink FFT block correctly?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|