Re: Stats Toolbox - DFITTOOL Error?
- From: "Bin Shi" <bshi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:08:55 -0400
Hi,
Please search this newsgroup for a similar discussion on 08/29/2005.
Hope this helps.
Bin
"R Gow" <r.d.gow_no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ef13bff.-1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I am using the DFITTOOL of the Stats Toolbox, and for each fit made,
> the fit summary shows a log likelihood value. Fits which appear good
> visually are in the order of -ve millions, for example -3.4243E006.
> Here, the fit with log likelihood -3E006 would appear closer than one
> with say, -5E006, implying that the closer the log likelihood is to
> zero (or unity?) the better?
>
> Nevertheless, some poor appearing fits have L.L. in the order of -ve
> thousands. Again, a fit with L.L. -1500 would appear better than one
> with -5000, again implying that the lower the value the better, but
> this cant be the case since -1500 is obviously less than -5E006, yet
> the -5E006 fit would look better?!
>
> Is there an error perhaps in the toolbox - for example, should the
> good fits have a negative exponent, i.e. -5E-006? What basically is
> the purpose in the likelihood value - how should it be used when
> comparing fits??
>
> Thanks, i very much appreciate any advice you have.
.
- References:
- Stats Toolbox - DFITTOOL Error?
- From: R Gow
- Stats Toolbox - DFITTOOL Error?
- Prev by Date: Re: Alpha not working in GUI
- Next by Date: Ecoder
- Previous by thread: Stats Toolbox - DFITTOOL Error?
- Next by thread: Re: Stats Toolbox - DFITTOOL Error?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|