Re: Data via wire and/or RF?
- From: "J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:46 -0400
Wayne Lundberg wrote:
"J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e52tre12fi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wayne Lundberg wrote:permission
Hint--what goes down the wire is RF, same as what goes over the air. The
main benefit of the wire is that you don't have to get anybody's
to use the bandwidth.This is what I was looking for. Thank you!
Just brainstorming here.... if I had a wire connected from transmitter to
receiver undeployed antenna... it would do the same as a deployed antenna?
Maybe. Depends on the details of the circuit design. You're almost
certainly going to end up overdriving the receiver, possibly far enough to
damage it--remember that it's designed for less signal strength than it's
going to be getting down the cable. Then there's the matter of matching
impedances. Then there are likely other factors that I haven't
considered--I know enough electronics to be dangerous, but not enough to be
good at it.
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
.
- References:
- Data via wire and/or RF?
- From: Wayne Lundberg
- Re: Data via wire and/or RF?
- From: J. Clarke
- Re: Data via wire and/or RF?
- From: Wayne Lundberg
- Re: Data via wire and/or RF?
- From: J. Clarke
- Re: Data via wire and/or RF?
- From: Wayne Lundberg
- Data via wire and/or RF?
- Prev by Date: Re: Roboscout - Any info?
- Next by Date: Re: What is the state of Robotics Currently.
- Previous by thread: Re: Data via wire and/or RF?
- Next by thread: Re: Data via wire and/or RF?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|