Re: Huh? DAPRA GC was not a good thing?
- From: "Randy M. Dumse" <rmd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:59:42 -0500
"Donald" <donald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:oKydnb7-rcPvK8_eRVn-ug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Whats the diff.
What's the difference between being blow up with a robot of your own
design, and being blown up by a religious zealot?
If you can't see through the difference between complicit suicide and
homicide with rational thought, you could always pray for guidance.
--
Randy M. Dumse
Caution: Objects in mirror are more confused than they appear.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Huh? DAPRA GC was not a good thing?
- From: Dean Burell
- Re: Huh? DAPRA GC was not a good thing?
- References:
- Huh? DAPRA GC was not a good thing?
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Huh? DAPRA GC was not a good thing?
- From: Donald
- Huh? DAPRA GC was not a good thing?
- Prev by Date: Re: DARPA Grand Challenge
- Next by Date: Re: Huh? DAPRA GC was not a good thing?
- Previous by thread: Re: Huh? DAPRA GC was not a good thing?
- Next by thread: Re: Huh? DAPRA GC was not a good thing?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading