Re: Is Adobe violating their own standards
- From: "Steve/Aus" <adlab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 02:05:02 GMT
"Lee Blevins" <leeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1huiqqw.o3erqe12mgwx4N%leeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Steve/Aus <adlab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Postscript is the universal printer description language or is
supposed
to be, or indeed it was. A postscript file created in practically any
application on any platform could be read and used in practically any app
on
any platform.
that ain't necessarily so.
It was amongst the first to succesfully cross-platform and yet this
standard which should, if anything, gotten better over the years seems to
be
moving further away from being universal.
In the beginning there was that cntrl-d thing that made it not mac/pc
cross platform so I'd have to question that. Whatever program read the
file had to know that the first character was cntl-d or not to know what
the file was. Mac's didn't precede all text files (postcript files) with
control-d.
My experience with this comes from the fact I use CorelDraw as my
preferred vector drawing program. Without going into precise details why,
it
has a lot to do with being able to have multiple page documents and
running
the files to a reel-to-reel digital label printer (not a thermal printer,
a
PS3 colour laser printer).
Corecl Draw, worst PostScript generating program I ever saw.
Back to postscript, since the release of the CS suite of programs by
Adobe, I can not import EPS files created in CS programs into CorelDraw
version 12 even though it does support level three postscript. Out the
window goes the standard. EPS files created in other apps and pre-CS are
not
a problem. Therefore I must conclude that the code in EPS files created
by
CS programs is different.
Corel Draw, PC base, PC, Windows, created a multi-page EPS file. I was
shocked when the Red Book clearly stated that EPS had to be a single
page. But, Windows marches to the beat of a different drummer. Am I
shocked that Corel output is problematic? NO.
The work-around for this is to send the files to my bureau who opens
them in a CS program, usually Illustrator or InDesign back saves them and
then creates a new EPS file which opens into CorelDraw without a problem.
I could easily draw conclusions as what I think might be happening
here
but I will refrain as there *could* well be a more logical answer. In any
case, 'why fix it if it ain't broke' certainly comes to mind.
Steve W (in Aus)
My suggestion, get a better program than Corel.
In response to your informative answer (for which I am grateful) Postscript
ain't being universal is somewhat obvious, In fact that was purpose of this
post.
For your second point, the control-D thingy, I was completely oblivious to
this, good point.
To your third point, Corel being the worst Postsrcipt generator, I am not
actually trying to generate postscript, rather bring postscript into Corel.
Notwithstanding that when I do generate postscript I use an Adobe virtual
postscript printer driver to do the job, not Corel.
In regards to your fourth point, I was not aware that Windows etc. has the
abilities to generate multi-page EPS files, neither have I ever made a
multipage EPS file or see the need to. And again I must stress that I did
not suggest in any way that Corel's output is problematic. I have not found
it so, neither has my bureau or a number of other digital print shops. Like
most things in this game, if you know what you're doing you should be able
to avoid problems. My bureau has stated on many occasions that my files are
the easiest to work with, just RIP and go. As expected, by far the majority
of files he gets are Mac-CS, then Corel's output really can't be that bad.
It's people's output that fails miserably in just about all cases.
On your last point, what is better? Different maybe, lose some features,
gain others, but the word 'better' is very subjective. I did state that I
must have multi-page capabilities and it must be a vector drawing program.
Not a lot to choose from is there really.
Steve W (in Aus)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Adobe violating their own standards
- From: Lee Blevins
- Re: Is Adobe violating their own standards
- References:
- Is Adobe violating their own standards
- From: Steve/Aus
- Re: Is Adobe violating their own standards
- From: Lee Blevins
- Is Adobe violating their own standards
- Prev by Date: Re: Is Adobe violating their own standards
- Next by Date: Re: Is Adobe violating their own standards
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Adobe violating their own standards
- Next by thread: Re: Is Adobe violating their own standards
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|