Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- From: Rob <nomail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 06 Jun 2009 11:15:43 GMT
Richard B. Gilbert <rgilbert88@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It has always amazed me that in an all-digital system like GSM there is
no standard way to communicate wallclock time from the network to the
handhelds. Even a once-per-hour time transmission that would sync the
freerunning clock in the phone would be fine for most users.
I tend to rely on my wrist watch for time rather than my cell phone.
I don't have a wrist watch. I use my phone to know what time it is.
Also, I think most people buy cell phones to use as phones and would
never miss having the correct time on the phone.
I don't know the situation in your country, but over here the function
of a cell phone to be used as a phone is becoming a smaller fraction of
its total functionality, and sometimes one even wonders if it is the
primary function (both when deciding to buy the model and in actual use).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- References:
- Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- From: Unruh
- Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- From: ScottyG
- Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- From: Harlan Stenn
- Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- From: Unruh
- Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- From: Rob
- Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- Prev by Date: Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- Next by Date: Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- Previous by thread: Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- Next by thread: Re: .1 Microsecond Synchronization
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|