Re: http://www.ntp.org/ => a blank page?
- From: Dave Hart <davehart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 03:47:42 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 5, 10:14, Martin Burnicki <martin.burni...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The IPv4 address is used only after the IPv6 address has timed out, even
though (as far as I understand it) the DNS server first returns an IPv4
address, then an IPv6 address:
# host support.ntp.org
support.ntp.org has address 204.152.184.138
support.ntp.org has IPv6 address 2001:4f8:0:2::23
That's a bit misleading. At the protocol level the queries are often
distinct, asking for A or AAAA records. type=any will return both but
is not typically used in apps. At the app level, if the app looks up
a name indicating both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are desired, platform
and site policies come into play
I know a possible solution would be to use a IPv6-over-IPv4 tunnel to the
internet. However, if this has not been set up then access may fail for a
reason which is not obvious.
AFAIK some browsers, e.g. Firefox, can be configured to prefer either IPv4
or IPv6, so this can be solved without a tunnel.
It sounds like you use a disconnected IPv6 network alongside a
connected RFC1918 v4 network internally. I wonder if you could get by
using only link-local addresses for your internal IPv6 network? I
believe that would solve the problem because your stack would know it
can't connect to a global v6 address from a machine with only link-
local v6 addresses.
A good solution would be to let the local DNS server discard IPv6 addresses
returned from forwarders while maintaining IPv6 suuport for the local
zone/network, but I currently don't know if/how this can be configured for
bind 9.
This may indeed be the best option for your configuration. I wouldn't
call it a good solution, though. Your machines should be able to
handle seeing AAAA records via IPv4-accessible DNS even if they can't
use them. I'd dig into configuring the machines to use IPv6 as a last
resort before considering DNS server-based AAAA filtering.
Cheers,
Dave Hart
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: http://www.ntp.org/ => a blank page?
- From: Danny Mayer
- Re: http://www.ntp.org/ => a blank page?
- From: Martin Burnicki
- Re: http://www.ntp.org/ => a blank page?
- References:
- http://www.ntp.org/ => a blank page?
- From: David J Taylor
- Re: http://www.ntp.org/ => a blank page?
- From: Terje Mathisen
- Re: http://www.ntp.org/ => a blank page?
- From: David J Taylor
- Re: http://www.ntp.org/ => a blank page?
- From: Rob
- Re: http://www.ntp.org/ => a blank page?
- From: Steve Kostecke
- Re: http://www.ntp.org/ => a blank page?
- From: Rob
- Re: http://www.ntp.org/ => a blank page?
- From: Martin Burnicki
- http://www.ntp.org/ => a blank page?
- Prev by Date: Re: improving ntpd performance on Windows
- Next by Date: Re: improving ntpd performance on Windows
- Previous by thread: Re: http://www.ntp.org/ => a blank page?
- Next by thread: Re: http://www.ntp.org/ => a blank page?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|