Re: frequency adjusting only
- From: Unruh <unruh-spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 02:40:21 GMT
mayer@xxxxxxxxxxx (Danny Mayer) writes:
Unruh wrote:
"David L. Mills" <mills@xxxxxxxx> writes:
Brian,
The longest delay NTP response was from the Moon, as simulated at JPL.
Next step is the Mars orbiters and then the rovers. JPL discovered the
max distance threshold had to be increased to handle the Moon delay.
Thats only a few sec.
And it is symmetrical. Could probably still get usec resolution.
Of course it's not symmetrical. You of all people should know better
than that.
The speed of light differs in different directions?
And if the response is fast, the distance has not changed much either
(In a msec the moon moves about a meter, which is 3nsec, way below any
computer resultion)and that is amost all perp to the earth.Ie, the
difference in distance during the response time of the remote computer is
negligible. If you aim for the moon when the moon is just setting and you
are on the equator, the difference in path lengths is about 5usec, again, a
completely negligible amount.
Now of course the synchronization will not proper time on the moon, but the
sync of the earth clock.
Danny.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: frequency adjusting only
- From: Danny Mayer
- Re: frequency adjusting only
- References:
- Re: frequency adjusting only
- From: Bill Unruh
- Re: frequency adjusting only
- From: David L. Mills
- Re: frequency adjusting only
- From: Brian Utterback
- Re: frequency adjusting only
- From: David L. Mills
- Re: frequency adjusting only
- From: Unruh
- Re: frequency adjusting only
- From: Danny Mayer
- Re: frequency adjusting only
- Prev by Date: Re: frequency adjusting only
- Next by Date: Re: frequency adjusting only
- Previous by thread: Re: frequency adjusting only
- Next by thread: Re: frequency adjusting only
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|