Re: pool configuration directive on Windows
- From: mayer@xxxxxxxxxxx (Danny Mayer)
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:50:23 GMT
David L. Mills wrote:
Danny,
The specific accusation directed to me personally was about the notrust
bit, which change I described in my previous message. I hadn't noticed
the L option change, which was not by my hand.
Well it might well have been me since I have touched that code a number
of times. I'm intending to get rid of it as soon as Harlan and I have
agreement on the syntax of the changes. This will implement listen-on
and query-on directives in the configuration file to allow the admins to
have control over exactly what addresses and interfaces to use to
receive and transmit NTP packets. I already have working code for this.
We just have details to resolve.
Danny
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: pool configuration directive on Windows
- From: David L. Mills
- Re: pool configuration directive on Windows
- References:
- pool configuration directive on Windows
- From: Ryan Malayter
- Re: pool configuration directive on Windows
- From: Martin Burnicki
- Re: pool configuration directive on Windows
- From: Ryan Malayter
- Re: pool configuration directive on Windows
- From: Martin Burnicki
- Re: pool configuration directive on Windows
- From: David L. Mills
- Re: pool configuration directive on Windows
- From: Martin Burnicki
- Re: pool configuration directive on Windows
- From: Danny Mayer
- Re: pool configuration directive on Windows
- From: David L. Mills
- pool configuration directive on Windows
- Prev by Date: Re: drift value very large and very unstable
- Next by Date: Re: pool configuration directive on Windows
- Previous by thread: Re: pool configuration directive on Windows
- Next by thread: Re: pool configuration directive on Windows
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading